Loved ones of people laid to rest in graves at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.
The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to proceed.
“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
One resident remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, along with its place of worship and burial ground.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”
“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”
Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be moved.
“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”
In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
An absence of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.
Some want additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with residents.”
He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”
“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. We need good local conversations to discover the right answers for each village.”
The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.
Maya Chen is a seasoned gaming journalist with over a decade of experience covering video game releases and industry trends.